Investing Information


Going Against the Conventional Investment Wisdom


First of all, I want to give everyone the disclaimer that I am not a registered financial advisor and I don't play one on TV. Therefore, I cannot legally provide financial advice and I will not do so. This is for informational purposes only and I'm not recommending any of my personal investment strategies to anyone else. Now, with that being said, I will outline some techniques I use for my personal investment strategy, without going into a whole lot of specifics. I generally go against the conventional investment wisdom that you are accustomed to hearing, although I do use both a conservative and a not-so-conservative strategy.

Most financial advisors put a great deal of emphasis on diversification. While this is probably appropriate for most people, I personally don't buy it. The idea is that it limits risk. While it does indeed limit risk, for me it also limits my upside potential way too much. Therefore, I basically disregard the whole concept. Most advisors will encourage investing for the long term. This strategy is generally successful in building wealth, but unfortunately for me, it wouldn't until after I'm old or dead. I invest for the short and intermediate terms.

I also do not buy or trade individual stocks. Instead, I buy and trade no-load mutual funds, including index funds. Even with the use of a deep-discount broker, commissions from trading individual stocks will add up and cut into my profits. True no-load mutual funds don't cost me anything to buy or sell. Besides, owning shares in a mutual fund is like owning shares of a lot of different stocks at one time without having to actually buy any of those stocks. Instead of buying individual stocks, I am buying classes or groups of stocks. I also don't have to worry about which stocks to buy or sell, as that job is being taken care of by the fund managers.

Now, let's talk about some guidelines I use specifically for my conservative strategy. I only buy funds that have earned a "Five-Star" rating from Morningstar (www.morningstar.com). They must also have a Morningstar risk rating of "low", "below average", or "average." In addition, they must have a Morningstar return rating of "above average" or "high." Also, they must be long-term winners, i.e., near the top of their categories in five-year and/or ten-year performance. I also require them to be "Lipper Leaders", as deemed by Lipper (www.lipperleaders.com), in the categories of "Returns", "Capital Preservation", and "Consistency."

In my mind, consistency is just as important as high overall return and capital preservation. An inconsistent or volatile fund can cause problems for short and intermediate term investors, even if its longer term performance is excellent. Here's the problem: Let's say a fund that I invested in went down 50% in the first year I owned it. It would have to go up a whopping 100% the next year for me to break even after two years. However, let's say it went down 25% after the first year. In that case, the fund would only have to go up 33% in the second year for me to break even. A 20% drop in the first year would need only a 25% increase in the second year to break even; a 15% drop would need only an 18% increase; a 10% drop would require only an 11% increase; and so on. Therefore, I stick with funds that have never gone down more than 10-20% in any one year. I prefer funds that have never had a losing year, but those are very hard to find.

What about my more aggressive strategy? This is the one that I'm using more and more often and is becoming more profitable, although I probably couldn't quit my job and make a living off of it just yet. Is it going to make me rich? Probably not. However, I hope it will eventually put me in a financial position to retire early. This strategy involves actively trading various no-load market index funds. The experts say you can't successfully time the market. I believe this is true when using the strictest definition of the term, "market timing."

However, I have been able to trade successfully with the short-term momentum already established by the market. Why no-load market index funds instead of individual stocks or Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) that mirror various market indexes? Because no-load market index funds allow leveraging and short selling without the need for a margin account. Also, some of these funds allow twice-daily trading (which is important for exiting early on bad days). In addition, the fund company I use doesn't charge redemption fees for actively trading its funds. Most fund companies, even those that specialize in no-load funds, charge these fees.

Like I said at the beginning, I'm not going into great detail, especially about my more aggressive strategy. However, I should define some terms so all of this will make more sense to those who are novices in the world of investments.

What is leveraging? Leveraging, in this context, is the ability to buy shares of a stock or mutual fund and realize a multiple of its gain or loss during the time you hold it. For example, if you buy a fund leveraged at 2 times a given stock index and that fund goes up 20%, you realize a 40% gain. However, if it goes down 20%, you incur a 40% loss. With individual stocks or ETFs, you need a margin account to do this. With a margin account, your broker is loaning you money on "margin" at a rather high rate of interest to cover the leveraged (or extra) amount. Obviously, this could be very risky and costly. However, there are some funds that have this leveraging built in at no cost to you. These funds automatically give you one-and-a-half or two times the gain or loss of a given stock index.

What is short selling? Short selling is when you sell a stock (that you don't already own) immediately at its current market price while agreeing to buy it at whatever the market price will be at a fixed point in the near future. In other words, you are betting that the stock will be going down, so you can buy it for less than you sold it for. Have you ever heard anyone say "don't sell me short"? Well, this is where that term came from. Selling someone short is tantamount to treating them like a bad stock that you believe is going down. Yes, it's backwards of the normal process of buying and selling stocks. As with leveraging, you need a margin account to do this for individual stocks or ETFs. Your broker loans you money on "margin" (actually buying the stock temporarily), so you can sell a stock that you don't own yet.

Once again, however, the funds I use have this short selling mechanism already built in to them at no cost to you. For example, you can buy a fund that gives you the inverse performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index. When that index goes up 10%, the fund goes down 10%; conversely, when that index goes down 10%, the fund goes up 10%. There are even funds with leveraging and short selling built in to them, at no cost to you! For example, there is an available fund that goes up 20% when the Nasdaq-100 Index goes down 10%. Of course, that same fund goes down 20% when then the Nasdaq-100 Index goes up 10%. As you can probably imagine, these funds can be powerful tools for profit-making for those who know how to use them, but can be highly dangerous for those who do not.

For more information about any or all of these concepts and to find out what kind of investment is right for you, contact your financial advisor and/or do your own research. Hopefully, I have provided some food for thought as well as several resources that might be helpful to you when doing your own research.

Terry Mitchell is a software engineer, freelance writer, and trivia buff from Hopewell, VA. He also serves as a political columnist for American Daily and operates his own website - http://www.commenterry.com - on which he posts commentaries on various subjects such as politics, technology, religion, health and well-being, personal finance, and sports. His commentaries offer a unique point of view that is not often found in mainstream media.


MORE RESOURCES:

Franklin Templeton Investments Ranked #1 for 10-Year Performance in Barron's ...
MarketWatch (press release)
SAN MATEO, CA, Feb 06, 2012 (MARKETWIRE via COMTEX) -- Franklin Templeton Investments ranked #1 out of 45 mutual fund families for its funds' 10-year performance in Barron's annual review of fund families.(1) Barron's rankings are based on ...
Delaware Investments Tops “Barron's Fund Families Report” for 2011Business Wire (press release)

all 9 news articles »


Your Most Important Investing Decision of the Next 10 Years
TheStreet.com
And these are some of the most boring companies you can think of -- real-state investment trusts (REITs), pipeline operators and cigarette makers. But they all have one thing in common. As the chief investment strategist behind High-Yield Investing, ...

and more »


Ask the Experts: What looks attractive for investors?
Kansas City Star
By CLAUDIA BUCK With the economy starting to perk up, investors are wondering where they should be looking next. Here with some recommendations is Glenn Kenes, managing director of investments with Barber-Kenes Capital Management Group in Auburn, ...

and more »


Freedom Investing 2012
Forbes
I've been discussing foreign freedom investing for a decade now. In the spring of 2010, I used the term “Ring-of-Fire” to describe countries with a high debt and deficit and suggested avoiding them. A year later, I revisited that advice and counseled ...

and more »


TD Ameritrade Investor Poll: Younger Investors More Likely to Invest "More" in ...
MarketWatch (press release)
OMAHA, Neb., Feb 06, 2012 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- The European debt crisis, US unemployment, the housing market, and political uncertainty - a laundry list of issues that may be causing investors to think more cautiously about their financial futures.

and more »


Book Review Of 'Contrarian Investment Strategies: The Psychological Edge'
Seeking Alpha
Having read and enjoyed his 1998 "Contrarian Investment Strategies: The Next Generation", I was pleased to see this comprehensive updated edition ("Contrarian Investment Strategies: The Psychological Edge")by longtime contrarian value investor David ...

and more »


Moneycontrol.com

Various Ways to Invest in Gold, Silver and Other Precious Metals
CoinWeek (blog)
By Mark Ferguson on February 6, 2012 11:43 AM By Mark Ferguson for CoinWeek – MFRareCoins.com Using gold as an example, the first investing decision you need to make is whether you want to invest in “paper gold” or “physical gold.
Junior Gold Producers: The Cycle TurnsResource Investor
What Lies Ahead For Stocks, Gold, Silver And Platinum After The Greek Default?Seeking Alpha

all 83 news articles »


5-Star Stocks Poised to Pop: Beam
DailyFinance
By Brian D. Pacampara, The Motley Fool Posted 10:01AM 02/06/12 Investing Based on the aggregated intelligence of 180000-plus investors participating in Motley Fool CAPS, the Fool's free investing community, premium spirits specialist Beam (NYS: BEAM) ...
An Easy Way to Boost Your ReturnsMotley Fool

all 51 news articles »


Globe and Mail

18% of Canadians now use online brokerages but another 16% are thinking about it
Financial Post
More than a third (34%) of Canadian investors now use online brokerage accounts or are considering doing so, according to a BMO InvestorLine survey released Monday. The poll of 1551 Canadian adults (18+) found 320 or 18% currently investing online.
Do-It-Yourself Investing: How to Come Out Ahead by Using an Online Brokerage ...MarketWatch (press release)

all 36 news articles »


MarkWest expanding in Marshall, investing in Ohio
The Steubenville Herald-Star
based company also will build totally new processing plants on the western side of the Ohio River in Monroe and Harrison counties, an investment that Ohio Gov. John Kasich said will total about $500 million. Although Kasich quoted the $500 million ...

and more »

Google News

home-bondsnstocks.com | site map
© 2007